Wetland assessment system.Driving forceScoresPressScoresState-impactScoresResponseScoreProtection of water resources (A)3.95Water quality improvement (A1)4.28Nutrient removal (A11)4.50Water quality (A12)4.60Hydrological regime (A2)3.61Groundwater discharge (A22)3.72Micro-climate regulation (A21)3.50Landscape and environmental maintenance (B)3.86Landscape setting (B1)3.47Structure of the landscape (B11)3.44Environmental amenity (B12)3.50Land-use (B2)4.25Types of land-use (B21)4.50Ambiance of land (B22)4.00Ecosystem health (C)4.17Ecological stability (C1)4.14Disturbance (C12)3.94Biodiversity (C11)3.96Habitat structure (C13)4.34Habitat quality (C14)4.31Conservation (C2)4.25Protection of native CFTRinh-172 (C21)4.13Protection of unique/sensitive environment (C22)4.34Culture assets (D)4.30Education and public awareness (D1)4.35Education promotion (D11)4.25Public participation (D13)4.50Research (D12)4.31Culture resource (D2)4.21Combination of local cultural development (D22)4.38Preservation of historical assets (D21)4.04Socio-economicservices (E)4.09Renewable resources (E1)4.10Agriculture/fishy resources (E11)3.81Effluent reuse (E12)4.25Green energy (E13)4.25Tourism resources (E2)3.91Eco-tourism (E21)4.06Tourism sites (E22)3.75Urban infrastructure capability (E3)4.20Contribution for adjacent land (E32)4.16Enhancement of business development (E31)3.81Operations management(F)4.14Operational effectiveness (F1)4.50Cost effectiveness (F11)Number of years of successful operation (F12)4.254.75Organization and management4.31Operating4.38Cost allocation4.25Bold signifies relatively more important indicators.Source: Results compiled from this research study.Full-size tableTable optionsView in workspaceDownload as CSV
↧
